What the tool intends to assess
Purpose, inputs, rules or method, expected outputs and intended users should be described clearly enough for a reviewer to challenge the result.
Evidence · Transparency · Human review
Tool Assurance & Evidence Register
This register explains the intended purpose, publicly described data boundaries and evidence requirements of RegTech Nexus AI review-support tools. It is a transparency register—not an audit opinion, security certification, legal opinion or claim that every function has been independently tested.
How to interpret this register
Evidence boundary: entries summarise public descriptions and identify validation needs. They do not mean that a live functional test, penetration test, privacy assessment or independent assurance engagement has been completed. Where evidence is not recorded, the status is “not verified by this register.”
What must be tested
Representative workflows, boundary conditions, calculation examples, error handling, exports and browser behaviour require repeatable test evidence.
What must be substantiated
Processing, storage, network requests, browser storage, third-party services, retention and access statements should match observed implementation and documented controls.
Public tool profiles
These are initial profiles. They intentionally separate public product descriptions from claims that still require validation.
TradeGuard
Trade-finance and transaction-risk review support using rule-based indicators.
- Publicly stated boundary
- The product page says the tool supports review, does not determine money laundering or legal liability, and requires an authorised human reviewer. It advises against entering confidential documents in the public workspace.
- Evidence to retain
- Rule catalogue and version, test cases and expected results, indicator rationale, data-flow observations, report/export tests and release history.
- Verification status
- Public description reviewed for this register. Live functionality and technical security controls have not been independently verified here.
Policy Gap Analyzer
Policy-to-control review signals and evidence-gap action planning.
- Publicly stated boundary
- The product page describes browser-local analysis, recommends synthetic or non-sensitive excerpts, and states that outputs are review signals—not compliance certification or a legal/regulatory decision.
- Evidence to retain
- Source-pack registry, official source and applicability notes, matcher test cases, browser network/storage checks, output/export tests and known limitations.
- Verification status
- Public description reviewed for this register. Browser-local processing and all functions require technical re-verification before relying on that claim.
ICMS Toolkit
Internal-control readiness, ownership and corrective-action planning.
- Publicly stated boundary
- The product page describes a browser-based tracker, CSV export and no connection to a bank system or server-side case database.
- Evidence to retain
- Sample-based workflow tests, action-register and export reconciliation, browser data-handling checks, source/version records and accessibility results.
- Verification status
- Public description reviewed for this register. Live functionality, persistence behaviour and technical controls have not been independently verified here.
PayScale 2026
A rule-transparent planning calculator based on user-selected official scale and phase assumptions.
- Validation focus
- Document official source/version, assumptions, test vectors, boundary cases, rounding and output examples. Do not present illustrative output as an official pay-fixation decision.
- Verification status
- Full calculation accuracy and source freshness are not verified by this register.
International Readiness Tools
Jurisdiction-oriented evidence-gap and action planning.
- Validation focus
- Verify each jurisdiction pack against official primary sources, applicability conditions, effective dates and amendments. Test scoring or status logic separately from source mapping.
- Verification status
- Pack-level source traceability and assessment logic require jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction review.
International Regulatory Calculators
Banking-risk calculations mapped to standards and country rules.
- Validation focus
- Record formula provenance, jurisdictional assumptions, units, rounding, test vectors, source versions and material changes. Distinguish a calculation aid from an official regulatory return.
- Verification status
- Each module requires its own source and calculation test record; this register does not certify the suite.
Minimum review method
| Control step | Minimum evidence | Review outcome |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Discover source | Issuer, jurisdiction, exact instrument, official URL and publication date. | Source is traceable to the primary issuer. |
| 2. Verify applicability | Relevant provision, scope conditions, effective date, amendments and supersession check. | Applicability is supported, qualified or marked for verification. |
| 3. Map requirement | Requirement-to-control mapping, assumptions and rationale. | Mapping is reviewable, not automatic legal interpretation. |
| 4. Test functionality | Test input, expected output, actual output, pass/fail, date and version. | Observed behaviour is distinguished from untested claims. |
| 5. Check data boundaries | Browser/network inspection, storage and export behaviour, third-party requests and disclosure review. | Data-handling claims match observed behaviour or are corrected. |
| 6. Approve and monitor | Reviewer, review date, issue log, next review trigger and change history. | Material changes can be traced and re-tested. |
Regulatory source freshness
Prefer official regulator or standards-body publications. Check the current instrument, amendment history, effective date and transition provisions. A source link alone does not establish applicability or correct implementation.
- Bangladesh Bank — official website
- Bangladesh Financial Intelligence Unit — official website
- FATF — official website
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision — official website
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework — official website
- EUR-Lex — official EU legal texts
Responsible use: RegTech Nexus AI is an independent knowledge and review-support platform. This register does not provide legal advice, regulatory approval, compliance certification, penetration testing or assurance that a tool is suitable for confidential institutional data. Confirm source applicability and test the relevant tool before professional reliance.