FLAGSHIP · POLICY-TO-CONTROL REVIEW

Regulatory Control
& Policy Gap Analyzer.

Turn a policy excerpt into a structured review path: source, control question, policy signal, evidence gap and accountable next action.

Start a review →Read the method

01Source-mapped02Browser-local03Human-reviewed

Public pilot — independent review support

Analysis runs in your browser; this page does not send policy text to a server. Use synthetic, public or non-sensitive excerpts only. Results are review signals—not compliance certification, legal advice or a regulatory decision. Verify current official sources, applicability and evidence with authorised professionals.

Choose the right review pathway

Policy Gap Analyzer: start with a non-sensitive policy excerpt to identify text-based review signals and organise evidence-gap questions. It does not verify whether a control operates effectively.

ICMS Toolkit: use for broader governance, control ownership, monitoring, self-assessment and corrective-action planning. Keep the assessment evidence-based and independently reviewed.

Open the ICMS Toolkit ↗ · Practise with guided case studies ↗

THE REVIEW PATH

From policy wording
to accountable action.

Each result is a transparent review signal. Confirm source applicability, operating evidence and accountable ownership before taking action.

Choose the control pack

Select a jurisdiction or thematic framework. Each pack shows its source path, applicability note and boundaries.

Compare the policy signal

Paste a non-sensitive excerpt or load the synthetic case. The transparent matcher looks for control anchors and conflict language.

Build the action plan

Review the classification, identify evidence, assign an owner and export a practical remediation register.

LIVE PUBLIC PILOT

Review a policy
without losing the trail.

Choose one source-mapped pack, enter a short policy excerpt and ask the analyzer to identify review signals. The output is a starting point for professional challenge—not a final compliance conclusion.

RNX-PCA-01 · TRANSPARENT REVIEW ENGINE

Policy-to-control comparison

All fields below remain in this browser until you export or clear them.

PHASE 1 · NO SERVER UPLOAD

Framework / jurisdiction The selected pack is a review method, not a statement that every requirement applies to every entity. Review label optional Use a non-sensitive label. Do not enter a customer, account or transaction name.

Policy excerpt or control description synthetic/non-sensitive only 0 / 12,000

Choose a pack and enter a policy excerpt to begin.

REVIEW OUTPUT

Evidence gap review

Review signals are ready for professional challenge.

0control areas

Illustrative browser-local outputThis result is based on the entered excerpt; no institutional evidence has been independently validated. The labels describe how the text maps to this review method. “Covered” means the excerpt contains an expected signal—it is not proof that the control operates effectively or that the requirement applies.

Module ID—Source registry—Source statusVerification required before relianceMethodTransparent browser-local anchor review

Source links for verification—

Policy-to-control review results
Control question	Policy signal	Review priority	Source and next action

CORE OUTPUT · EVIDENCE GAP ACTION PLAN

Turn open signals into owned work.

Owners and target dates remain editable in this browser before export.

Evidence gap action plan
Priority	Gap / action	Evidence reference / note	Suggested owner	Target date

METHOD & GOVERNANCE

Exceptional means
inspectable.

The product is intentionally designed around evidence, source traceability and accountable human review. The launch claim is narrow enough to be trusted and useful enough to be used.

01 · Source registry

Each pack identifies its internal module ID, source path and applicability note. Official pages are linked; protected text is not reproduced. Verify the current version before reliance.

02 · Current release status

The public release is a transparent browser-local matcher—not an AI inference engine. A private AI-assisted version is planned only after source versioning, security review, model validation and human approval controls.

03 · No false precision

The tool reports review classifications and evidence gaps. It does not create an invented percentage of legal compliance.

04 · Human decision owner

Policy approval, customer action, filing, escalation and regulatory interpretation remain with the authorised institution and its professionals.

PUBLIC PILOT

Suitable for

Learning, synthetic examples, policy workshops, control discussion and initial evidence planning.

NOT SUITABLE FOR

Do not use as

A certification, legal opinion, supervisory submission, live screening engine or sole basis for a customer or transaction decision.

NEXT PRIVATE RELEASE

Requires more controls

Secure document handling, authentication, access control, retention, audit logs, model validation, incident response and independent testing.

SOURCE PATHS

Read the source.
Then review the signal.

These links are provided for verification and scope checking. The product uses original summaries and does not copy regulator publications. A source path is not evidence that every requirement applies to every entity.

Bangladesh BankOfficial circular and notification source path↗Bangladesh FIUOfficial AML/CFT guidance library↗BFIU circular libraryOfficial circular and update path↗Singapore · MAS Notice 626AML/CFT source path for financial institutions↗UAE · CBUAE RulebookAML/CFT source path↗Australia · AUSTRACAML/CTF obligations source path↗International · NIST AI RMFAI risk-management reference path↗