Forwards
Contracts to transact at specified future terms. Key considerations include counterparty exposure, market movement and documentation.
Explore controls ↗
Financial derivatives connect markets, treasury, risk, accounting, governance and regulatory controls. This page provides a structured reference for understanding forwards, futures, options, swaps and related exposures through risk, compliance, reporting and audit-readiness perspectives.
A derivative is a financial contract whose value changes in response to an underlying asset, rate, index, price, credit characteristic or other reference factor. Derivatives can support legitimate hedging and risk-management objectives, but can also introduce or transfer significant risks.
Contracts to transact at specified future terms. Key considerations include counterparty exposure, market movement and documentation.
Standardised exchange-traded contracts. Margin, leverage, market risk and clearing arrangements are important considerations.
Contracts providing a right, generally without an obligation, to transact under specified terms. Premium, volatility and valuation are key considerations.
Contracts exchanging specified cash flows, including interest-rate and currency exposures. Valuation, counterparty and liquidity risks matter.
Instruments used to transfer or manage credit exposure, subject to applicable regulatory, legal and risk requirements.
OTC transactions may require additional attention to bilateral documentation, collateral, reporting, netting and counterparty risk.
Derivatives may be used to manage funding costs, currency exposure, interest-rate exposure and other balance-sheet risks.
A derivative can transfer or redistribute an economic risk between counterparties. A reduction in one risk can introduce another.
Changes in interest rates, FX rates, commodity prices, equity prices, volatility or other market factors can change derivative values.
A counterparty may default while the transaction has positive value. Exposure measurement, limits, netting and collateral are key controls.
Changes in counterparty credit quality and relevant market factors can affect credit valuation adjustments.
Margin calls, collateral requirements, funding pressure and difficulty exiting positions can create liquidity stress.
Trade capture, lifecycle processing, settlement, reconciliation and data-quality failures can create material exposure.
Contract enforceability, netting, collateral terms, pricing models, assumptions and market data require effective governance.
Requirements vary by jurisdiction, product, counterparty, trading venue, clearing status and transaction type. Always verify current primary-source requirements before operational use.
Bangladesh Bank's derivatives guidance addresses permitted derivatives, underlying exposure, hedging, risk management, suitability/appropriateness, documentation, reporting and approval conditions. The framework is particularly relevant to AD banks and eligible users.
Bangladesh Bank Derivatives Guideline ↗Relevant Basel areas include counterparty credit risk, SA-CCR, CVA risk, market risk, capital requirements and related disclosure and risk-management expectations.
Basel Framework ↗EMIR addresses OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories, including reporting, clearing and risk-mitigation requirements. MiFID II/MiFIR may also be relevant depending on the activity.
European Commission — EMIR ↗The US framework includes Dodd-Frank reforms and CFTC requirements covering areas such as swap reporting, clearing, execution, business conduct, record keeping and risk management, subject to applicability.
CFTC — Dodd-Frank ↗Regulatory reporting should be treated as a controlled data lifecycle rather than a submission-only activity.
Exceptions should be traceable from identification through investigation, correction, approval, resubmission where applicable and evidence retention.
Designed to address potential future exposure over the relevant close-out period under the applicable framework.
Generally reflects changes in current transaction or portfolio value and the applicable collateral arrangements.
Eligibility, valuation, haircuts, margin calls, disputes, settlement, reconciliation and concentration monitoring may require dedicated controls.
Derivatives may have important accounting implications, including fair-value measurement and hedge-accounting requirements. Relevant areas include FVTPL, cash-flow hedges, fair-value hedges, documentation, effectiveness and disclosure. Accounting treatment should be determined under the applicable accounting framework and approved accounting policies.
Derivatives are not inherently suspicious. Institutions should assess whether activity is consistent with the customer's business, risk profile and underlying economic rationale.
KYC/CDD → Beneficial Ownership → Sanctions Screening → Transaction Monitoring → Counterparty Risk → Escalation → Investigation → Record Keeping
A red flag is an indicator requiring further review. It is not, by itself, proof of money laundering, sanctions evasion, market abuse or other misconduct.
First line: Treasury, Trading, Operations.
Second line: Market Risk, Counterparty Risk, Compliance, Model/Operational Risk.
Third line: Internal Audit.
Oversight should address risk appetite, product approval, limits, material exposures, new products, stress scenarios, regulatory compliance and significant exceptions.
DISCOVER → INSPECT → VERIFY → TEST → CHALLENGE → ASSESS → RISK-RATE → REMEDIATE → RETEST → ASSURE
| Control area | Key review question |
|---|---|
| Product approval | Is the product approved under the institution's governance framework? |
| Regulatory permission | Is any regulatory approval, permission or condition applicable? |
| Underlying exposure | Is the underlying exposure identifiable, genuine and evidenced where required? |
| Counterparty | Has counterparty credit risk and eligibility been assessed? |
| Limits | Is exposure within approved limits? |
| Valuation | Is valuation reliable and independently challenged where appropriate? |
| Margin / collateral | Are margin and collateral requirements monitored and reconciled? |
| Reporting | Are regulatory reports complete, accurate, timely and traceable? |
| AML/CFT & sanctions | Are applicable financial-crime and sanctions controls operating? |
| Governance | Is management/Board oversight evidenced? |
| Audit trail | Can key decisions, exceptions and remediation actions be evidenced? |
Commercial exposure → FX risk → permitted hedge → trade → valuation → monitoring → reporting → evidence.
Floating-rate liability → interest-rate risk → appropriate derivative → counterparty assessment → valuation → monitoring.
Import exposure → commodity-price risk → eligible hedge → underlying-document verification → margin/collateral → monitoring.
Incorrect trade capture → incorrect exposure → reporting discrepancy → reconciliation exception → investigation → remediation → retest.
The regulatory-control chain can be viewed as:
Regulation → Obligation → Policy → Control → Data → Monitoring → Evidence → Assurance
This section is designed for periodic addition of selected developments from authoritative sources.
| Date | Jurisdiction | Authority | Development | Control consideration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periodic update | Bangladesh | Bangladesh Bank | Derivatives and commodity-price hedging guidance | Verify applicable product, underlying exposure, eligibility, approval and reporting conditions against the current primary source. |
| Periodic update | Global | BCBS / BIS | Basel derivatives and counterparty-risk framework | Assess applicable exposure, capital, risk-management and disclosure requirements. |
| Periodic update | EU / US | Relevant authorities | Derivatives reporting, clearing, margin and conduct developments | Determine jurisdictional and entity-level applicability before operational implementation. |